Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Leafs Rumours Member Posts
FrensUnited's Profile
FrensUnited's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To FrensUnited's Posts
To FrensUnited's last 5 rumours posts
To FrensUnited's last 5 rumour replies
FrensUnited's rumours posts with other poster's replies to FrensUnited's rumours posts
01 Jul 2026 17:49:43
SEA
- Knies
- Reilly
_______________
TOR
- Dunn
- Wright
- O'Brien or Catton
- Firkus.
26 Jun 2026 07:43:18
DAL
- Seguin
- Lybushkin
- 2026 2nd
- 2027 1st
TOR
- Robertson
- Carlo
Yes, you have to convince Seguin to waive. If he does manage to stay healthy this year, we sort out our 2C issue. If he's injured, he's on the IR for this year only, and we get a couple picks for the trouble.
Boosh is a 3rd pair upgrade over Carlo, who isn't re-signing in TOR. Robertson is sweetner for DAL to make this move.
This makes sense for Dallas, as they can sign BOTH Robertson and Bourque, and brings the Robertson brothers together.
1.) 26 Jun 2026 08:58:33
Seguin is old and broken. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s retired soon. As for Carlo vs Lybushkin we have been down that road with this player and as physical as he is he is very limited to what he can do.
2.) 26 Jun 2026 13:37:28
Dallas is getting rid of 1 Robertson. What makes you think they r going to want another? You think Carlo and Robertson are worth a 1st and 2nd plus Seguin and Lybushkin? Even though I wouldn’t want either of those guys. But a 1st and a 2nd is already an overpay.
3.) 26 Jun 2026 13:46:48
You wouldn’t get the two picks for Carlo and Robertson lol. Seguin is done.
14 Jun 2026 20:27:31
TOR
- 20th overall
- Mario Ferraro
_______________
SJ
- Morgan Rielly
I'm not optimistic we get Raddysh or Andersson this offseason. I know Ferraro's a lefty, but I still think he'd be a good add.
-
-
TOR
- 1st round pick (Carlo trade)
________________
BOS
- 20th overall
- COL's 2027 1st (conditional)
--
Tell BOS they can have the COL 1st rounder next year on condition that if the Leafs' are crap next year and the top-10 protection kicks in for the '27 1st, then PHI's pick defers to an unprotected '28 1st. So BOS would get additional compensation for missing out on an unprotected 1st in '28, as we'll specify to them that we aren't giving thm this pick in '27 if it's top 10.
1.) 14 Jun 2026 21:57:57
Ferraro is UFA. Don’t need to trade for him.
2.) 14 Jun 2026 23:42:20
And if Ferraro was not a UFA (who will probably re-sign with San Jose) they would not give us him and the 20th overall for Reilly. That would be such an overpay for him. As far as the Boston trade. We are in no position to tell them what they can and can't have, in any trade with us no matter how fictional it might be.
They would not agree to any terms in regards to protection if we really wanted that pick back from them.
3.) 16 Jun 2026 03:05:11
Source that Ferraro is likely to re-sign?
Reports are that contract talks have broke down and he is likely to test the market.
11 Jun 2026 15:09:37
I saw a Twitter snip of a mock Knies trade that looks something like this:
Nemec
Mercer
2x 1st round picks.
---------
While I'm not crazy about this trade, because I think there's probably something better out there for Knies, I do like it more than the MTL trade.
The point of my post is that I think this is the worst D corps in the Atlantic, and that alone makes things very difficult going into this year. If they're not in a playoff spot by December 1st, you can expect Auston to start asking serious questions.
So my idea: there is one thing I think they could do to make that Knies trade work: If the Leafs get NJ's 12th overall pick in that deal, they should go to Boston and explain to them that they can have the 12th overall pick now, or risk waiting to get TOR's 1st rounder in 2028 since we get to choose who takes it.
BOS
- 12th overall
- 60th overall
- 2028 2nd round pick
________________
TOR
- 23rd overall
- 2028 1st rounder (returned)
I think we'd need to sweeten the pot because BOS knows we could be in a bad spot by '28 if Auston doesn't re-sign. Still, they're in a retool as well, and may like what's available at 12th overall to do this.
1.) 12 Jun 2026 01:23:52
No thanks. If you want to move a player to get younger assets back then move Nylander.
11 May 2026 16:41:39
Can we please stop with trade proposals involving teams giving up assets where they do not have a surplus at that partcular position?
I understand Matthews would probably agree to SJ, but the reality is, there's no RHD in SJ's pipeline, and there are two RHD available in the top 4 this year.
Same with LA. Sure, We need a guy like Brandt Clarke, but so does LA. If they give up Clarke in any deal, who do they get to play RD when Doughty retires in a year or two?
1.) 11 May 2026 19:11:55
LA
Matthews
Carlo
Leafs
Byfield
Clarke
1st 2026
2nd 2027
2.) 11 May 2026 19:17:06
SJ
Matthews
Carlo
Leafs 2nd overall
Ravensbergen
Havelid
Musty
3.) 11 May 2026 19:50:20
Hawks
Matthews
Carlo
Leafs
4th overall
Levshunov
Vanacker
Pridham
4.) 11 May 2026 21:31:34
Well done, gentlemen.
FrensUnited has no Banter Posts
04 Jul 2026 17:13:44
If it's a case of Reilly and a couple mid round picks you absolutely do that deal.
Getting Wright thrown in will cost you Knies, which you're not doing unless you're also getting O'Brien and Furkus back too.
04 Jul 2026 17:05:24
SEA already has a glut of young centres in Beniers, O'Brien, and Catton. They won't want our young center.
If we could somehow pry Dunn from them for Reilly and COL's 1st then that'd make a lot of sense, but unfortunately that wouldn't clear up any needed cap space, which is an issue at the moment.
If they get Dunn, then they need to clear Joshua off the books. If they get Wright, then great, but then they still need to add on the left side of the D corps, and that becomes harder to do if they give up the COL 1st for Wright.
If Chayka really wants to get nuts, you can move Knies and Reilly for Wright, O'Brien, and Dunn, which I'm not actually crazy about, but I think that'd be something SEA would listen to as they want a quality top 6 player.
23 Jun 2026 13:54:21
Most fans weren't complaining about the Carlo trade when it happened. Sure, let's hand over a future 1st round pick and a prospect on a guy whose main attribute is being physical, but has had 3-4 concussions, and also has hands of concrete.
What could go wrong.
And as far as him playing better when he wasn't with Reilly, how many different D partners do we need to get Morgan before we admit he's the liability?
19 Jun 2026 15:53:00
OEL is not a top pairing Dman. He's older, and the UFA market means he may still get a decent return. They need someone else and that's where things get pricey...
With Andrae coming in and hypothetically being able to do what OEL does, that makes OEL expendable for the right price.
That 2nd pairing should be decent if they're healthy.
If they can get Coghlan on the 3rd pair to go with Andrae I could live with that...
??? - Raddysh
McCabe - Tanev
Coghlan - Andrae
18 Jun 2026 18:24:03
They are against moving Knies because he's a very unique, high quality young player. It's also feeling very inevitable that they do in fact move him because...
a. They won the draft lottery and will have a glut of left handed wingers.
b. They have the worst D corp in the Atlantic, and there's no guarantee they get Raddysh, and even if they do, there's no guarantee Raddysh can replicate last year's performance.
c. He's the only high quality asset without trade protection.
d. They don't have any 1st round picks. Corporate wants playoff revenue, and they can't afford to shit the bed another year and happen upon a top 3 pick. They're on their own for the next 2 years.
e. The value of Knies is such that they, in theory, could both acquire valuable roster pieces to help them compete for a playoff spot next year AND address the need going forward to get younger in light of them not having their next 2 first rounders.
Knies
Carlo
--FOR -
Beaudoin
Simashev
Durzi
19th overall
FrensUnited has no Banter Replies