Leafs Trade Rumors

10 Jun 2026 15:39:53
My weekly bored at work trades!

Matthews

To Philly For

Porter Martone
Jamie Drysdale
Toronto 1st
2026 1st
Oliver Bonk

William Nylander

To Utah for

Tij Iginla
Dmitri Simashev
2026 1st

Anthony Stolarz
2028 2nd
Nick Robertson

To Edm for

Matthew Savoie
Beau Akey
2027 3rd

2026 1st (Utah)
2028 1st (Col)
Joseph Woll

To Stl for

Robert Thomas

Knies

To Chi for

4th overall
Kevin Korchinski

Draft McKenna 1st overall
Draft Carels 4th
Hope we’re bad enough to finish last and get DuPont

Sign Raddysh
Sign Tuch

McKenna-Thomas-Martone
Iginla-Savoie-Tuch
Cowan-Tavares-Maccelli
Joshua-Quillan-Tverberg

Carels-Raddysh
Simashev-DuPont
Korchinksi-Drysdale

Akhtyamov
Hildeby

Guys this is obviously unrealistic please don’t take this serious.

09 Jun 2026 22:20:07
Tor: 7th
Cgy: Huberdeau, 2027 top 5 protected 1st

Tor: Reilly 20% retained
Ana: Zelwegger 2027 2nd

Tor: Stolarz
Edm: Savoie 4th

Tor: Nylander
Chi: Korinsky, 4th OA, 2027 2nd




Thoughts: Huberdeau is a big risk but Matthews needs someone passing him the puck and Huberdeau needs someone that can put his passes in the back of the net, that contract has negative value so we get a 1st with it because we don't make them retain.

We draft McKenna and Maholtra.

With us bringing in 2 D prospects and us having Danford we are looking pretty on D moving forward.

We have given up our 2 1sts for the next 2 years which sucks but we have gotten one back this year and with the Colorado pick 2 next year. We get younger and faster. We still have some work to do on this team but we don't go full rebuild and the only 2 remaining are Tavares and Matthews, if it's a bad year we look at recouping assets for Matthews at the deadline or next year.

Thoughts?

10 Jun 2026 08:54:33
There’s some flaws to your trade. The Flames, for starters, probably are not giving up a first. They are rebuilding so they don't need to move out money that bad. Also Brad isn't their GM anymore so at very least that pick is top 10 protected. The Reilly trade makes some sense, but if I'm the Leafs I'm not taking on money for another 5 years, and the Ducks aren't gonna give up Zellweger plus a 2nd, but I'd take Zellweger 1 for 1.

The Stollie trade I don't mind either, but he doesn't have any value since he's always hurt. And the last trade I just think Willy doesn't waive his no move for Chicago.

10 Jun 2026 09:40:26
Seriously?
The always injured Stolarz for Savoi plus a 4th.
I know we’re dealing with Stan Bowman but even he isn’t that cognitively deficient.

Huberdeau?
Huberdeau has 5 more years to run on his contract at $10.5 million.

Why would Anaheim want Rielly when they have two great young prospects in Mintyukov and Zelwegger?
Except you want them to give us Zelwegger plus a 2nd for Rielly.
Verbeek isn’t that foolish.

Korchinski can’t even make the Blackhawks team and has been passed on the depth chart by Levshunov and Sam Rinzel.
No thanks.

09 Jun 2026 03:53:54
Total rebuild incoming
San Jose gets
C Mathews
D Myers
D Benoit
RW/LW Robertson

Toronto gets
San Jose 2026 1st round pick
San Jose 2027 1st round pick
C Michael Misa
D Sam Dickinson

Rangers
RW Nylander
Stolarz G
Mcabe D

Toronto gets
RW/LW Alexis Lafrenière
Lorio D
Rangers 1st round pick 2027
Rangers 1st round pick 2028

Edmonton gets
Reilly D
Woll G

Toronto gets
Bouchard D

Dallas gets
Carlo D
Jarnkrok LW/RW

Toronto gets
Harley D
Lundkvist D

09 Jun 2026 13:11:45
Every single team hangs up and thanks you, stating there isn't much humour in the life of a GM.

09 Jun 2026 14:28:39
I agree with Shanacant on the GM’s hanging up. Except the Rangers one…. Which is a horrible one for Toronto. We would be giving up Nylander and arguably our 2nd best D-man in McCabe and Stolarz and we are getting back Lafreniere (who I do like) and a D-man who has played 36 games in the NHL and quite frankly has underwhelming scouting assessments.

The 2 first round picks depending on the Rangers rebuild we might not see until 2029, 2030 because they would want them Top 10 protected and there is a good chance they end up in the top 10.

09 Jun 2026 16:48:51
I misread the draft pick, thought they were giving us the 5th overall this year.

09 Jun 2026 20:12:22
Too much to unpack here, but you’re definitely not getting Bouchard for Reilly and Woll.

10 Jun 2026 05:44:38
Two 1st round picks plus Misa and Dickenson for a broken down Matthews.
Matthews would be only a 2nd line center behind Cellibrini.
Why would San Jose give up a haul like that for a 2nd line center.
Can’t imagine Grier would have any interest in doing that.

08 Jun 2026 17:03:26
Morgan Rielly -7.5m
Brandon Carlo -3.485m
Steven Lorentz -1.3m

To Flames for:

Kevin Bahl -5.350m
Zach Whitecloud -2.7m
Adam Klapka - 1.25m

08 Jun 2026 16:19:07
Add the Columbus 2027 2nd rnd Columbus pick to the Flames deal in order to make it happen^^^^^.

08 Jun 2026 18:11:26
I don't see why Calgary does this with where they are in their rebuild.

08 Jun 2026 21:18:06
Shanacant - Calgary has already stated everyone except a few players are in play for trades. The players I mention are not on the Flames "keep list"

Plus now the Chakacon is GM and Not Treedeading, Calgary aaand dToronto should be able to resume trading amoungst each other.

I personally like the targets and feel it is a great starting point to gain traction.

08 Jun 2026 21:41:05
I think what Shanacant was meaning is why would Calgary in a rebuild bring in those three players from the Leafs at those salaries when they are not retooling. They are rebuilding. Reilly, Carlo and Lorentz are not going to change the trajectory of the Flames in a rebuild.

08 Jun 2026 21:49:12
Sufferingsince1967 - Adding some veteran presence can help young guns. Maybe they don't mind the additions, they have the cap space and like I stated, it could be something that could evolve with tweaks and adds possibly,...... or not.

08 Jun 2026 22:47:59
I just don't see it happening. Bahl and Whitecloud are their 2 best defencemen at this point and we are offering them our #4 and #5 d men and we are asking for their most physical winger and offering them a 4th line player.

I might be wrong but I don't see a fit on this one at all. Would I want it for Toronto? Yeah but it is a very one sided deal and as step in the wrong direction for Calgary.

09 Jun 2026 13:13:41
Exactly my thoughts, thanks suffering.

10 Jun 2026 05:47:38
Calgary is entering a full rebuild.
The last thing a team should do in a full rebuild is bring in older players on expensive contracts.

08 Jun 2026 14:23:39
The Dylan Larkin situation is an interesting one as it will somewhat set a standard on what a #1 Centre is worth even with him kind of dictating the teams he will go to. The leading team for various reasons is Dallas out of the 3 teams he reportedly has told Detroit he wants to go to … Minnesota and Tampa being the others.

If the offer is said to be legit it would be a win-win for both teams. The names floated are Harley and Bourque for Larkin and Carter Bear.

Obviously Dallas gets stronger down the middle and also improves an already good defence with an elite defender and Dallas adds a very good prospect in Bear.

Most important on the Dallas end is they save roughly $6.5 million if Bourque signs in the anticipated $4.5 which allows them to keep Robertson. The plan would be to move Wyatt Johnstone to be on Larkin's wing.


If this comes to fruition it would be an interesting one to see if other parts are added. Would Matthews get us similar or less or more? Or would the extra $5m a year he earns deter some teams?

08 Jun 2026 16:00:07
Minny, Vegas, and Florida were supposedly his list.

08 Jun 2026 16:38:16
Seravelli says those 3 teams. Friedman on The Fan yesterday said Minny, Tampa, and Dallas. So who knows. But of the 2 I would say Eliot has a way better track record than Seravelli. I find Seravelli, though, is never wrong when he reports a trade after it’s been completed. lol

08 Jun 2026 22:44:46
I know it’s called guessing. That’s why they use the fancy term speculation or speculating, no fact.

09 Jun 2026 08:49:05
The rumour from the Detroit Free Press went nuts yesterday so there must be some truth behind it that being said he basically told Detroit to trade him to Minny because the other two don’t have the assets to make it work imo.

09 Jun 2026 12:28:00
Truth is… what has Minny got to offer up as well? Their prospect pool is ranked in the bottom 3rd of the league and they really don’t want to give up any major substance of their lineup. Anytime a member of the U.S. Olympic team comes up in trade rumours it’s Minny at the top of the list because of Bill Guerin.

Yzerman is going to play hardball and he wants a good return. None of those 3 have the assets. This is going to be fun do see who budges first. Larkin or Yzerman. I think Yzerman will basically tell Larkin to expand the list or report to camp.