Use our rumours form to send us leafs trade rumors.
Text Size Adjuster: 18px
Site last updated: 07:14:01
10 Jun 2026 02:03:55
Morgan Rielly
For
Barclay Goodrow
2027 2nd Round Draft Pick
Select Gavin McKenna at #1 Overall
Trade Pick #60 And Pick #158
For
Pick #43
Select Pierce Mbuyi at Pick #43
Select Brek Liske at Pick #69
These trades could fast-forward our rebuild by a few years because we will have extra money to spend in free agency from the Rielly trade, and we get some solid prospects!
Believable1Unbelievable0
10 Jun 2026 02:13:03
We aren’t in a rebuild.
Agree0Disagree0
10 Jun 2026 03:37:31
So why would Alex Steen, who is in a rebuild himself, trade a mid-round 2nd-round pick for a very late second-round and an even later 5th-round, almost a 6th-rounder? That makes zero sense.
Agree0Disagree0
10 Jun 2026 03:42:46
Not to mention... Why do we need to get Goodrow another 4th liner at over $3.5 m a year. We have guys from the Marlies who can step in there at much less and a lot younger.
09 Jun 2026 22:20:07
Tor: 7th
Cgy: Huberdeau, 2027 top 5 protected 1st
Tor: Reilly 20% retained
Ana: Zelwegger 2027 2nd
Tor: Stolarz
Edm: Savoie 4th
Tor: Nylander
Chi: Korinsky, 4th OA, 2027 2nd
Thoughts: Huberdeau is a big risk but Matthews needs someone passing him the puck and Huberdeau needs someone that can put his passes in the back of the net, that contract has negative value so we get a 1st with it because we don't make them retain.
We draft McKenna and Maholtra.
With us bringing in 2 D prospects and us having Danford we are looking pretty on D moving forward.
We have given up our 2 1sts for the next 2 years which sucks but we have gotten one back this year and with the Colorado pick 2 next year. We get younger and faster. We still have some work to do on this team but we don't go full rebuild and the only 2 remaining are Tavares and Matthews, if it's a bad year we look at recouping assets for Matthews at the deadline or next year.
09 Jun 2026 03:53:54
Total rebuild incoming
San Jose gets
C Mathews
D Myers
D Benoit
RW/LW Robertson
Toronto gets
San Jose 2026 1st round pick
San Jose 2027 1st round pick
C Michael Misa
D Sam Dickinson
Rangers
RW Nylander
Stolarz G
Mcabe D
Toronto gets
RW/LW Alexis Lafrenière
Lorio D
Rangers 1st round pick 2027
Rangers 1st round pick 2028
Edmonton gets
Reilly D
Woll G
Toronto gets
Bouchard D
Dallas gets
Carlo D
Jarnkrok LW/RW
Toronto gets
Harley D
Lundkvist D
Believable3Unbelievable0
09 Jun 2026 13:11:45
Every single team hangs up and thanks you, stating there isn't much humour in the life of a GM.
Agree5Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 14:28:39
I agree with Shanacant on the GM’s hanging up. Except the Rangers one…. Which is a horrible one for Toronto. We would be giving up Nylander and arguably our 2nd best D-man in McCabe and Stolarz and we are getting back Lafreniere (who I do like) and a D-man who has played 36 games in the NHL and quite frankly has underwhelming scouting assessments.
The 2 first round picks depending on the Rangers rebuild we might not see until 2029, 2030 because they would want them Top 10 protected and there is a good chance they end up in the top 10.
Agree2Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 16:48:51
I misread the draft pick, thought they were giving us the 5th overall this year.
Agree0Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 20:12:22
Too much to unpack here, but you’re definitely not getting Bouchard for Reilly and Woll.
Agree1Disagree0
10 Jun 2026 05:44:38
Two 1st round picks plus Misa and Dickenson for a broken down Matthews.
Matthews would be only a 2nd line center behind Cellibrini.
Why would San Jose give up a haul like that for a 2nd line center.
Can’t imagine Grier would have any interest in doing that.
08 Jun 2026 17:03:26
Morgan Rielly -7.5m
Brandon Carlo -3.485m
Steven Lorentz -1.3m
To Flames for:
Kevin Bahl -5.350m
Zach Whitecloud -2.7m
Adam Klapka - 1.25m
Believable5Unbelievable0
08 Jun 2026 16:19:07
Add the Columbus 2027 2nd rnd Columbus pick to the Flames deal in order to make it happen^^^^^.
Agree1Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 18:11:26
I don't see why Calgary does this with where they are in their rebuild.
Agree1Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 21:18:06
Shanacant - Calgary has already stated everyone except a few players are in play for trades. The players I mention are not on the Flames "keep list"
Plus now the Chakacon is GM and Not Treedeading, Calgary aaand dToronto should be able to resume trading amoungst each other.
I personally like the targets and feel it is a great starting point to gain traction.
Agree1Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 21:41:05
I think what Shanacant was meaning is why would Calgary in a rebuild bring in those three players from the Leafs at those salaries when they are not retooling. They are rebuilding. Reilly, Carlo and Lorentz are not going to change the trajectory of the Flames in a rebuild.
Agree3Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 21:49:12
Sufferingsince1967 - Adding some veteran presence can help young guns. Maybe they don't mind the additions, they have the cap space and like I stated, it could be something that could evolve with tweaks and adds possibly,...... or not.
Agree1Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 22:47:59
I just don't see it happening. Bahl and Whitecloud are their 2 best defencemen at this point and we are offering them our #4 and #5 d men and we are asking for their most physical winger and offering them a 4th line player.
I might be wrong but I don't see a fit on this one at all. Would I want it for Toronto? Yeah but it is a very one sided deal and as step in the wrong direction for Calgary.
Agree2Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 13:13:41
Exactly my thoughts, thanks suffering.
Agree2Disagree0
10 Jun 2026 05:47:38
Calgary is entering a full rebuild.
The last thing a team should do in a full rebuild is bring in older players on expensive contracts.
Then hope a Rudolph falls or take best available. The Blues have 3 first this year; they might be willing to part with 15 for an extra first next year.
Believable2Unbelievable0
08 Jun 2026 15:59:22
Doesn't sound like too bad of a deal, but we might want to keep next year's draft pick for next year. Don't want to get too far ahead of ourselves.
Agree0Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 17:00:25
I don't believe we own a first in 27, Philly does.
Agree0Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 18:15:55
I would actually like to hang onto that COL 1st. They're getting old down the middle, and if they miss the playoffs next year for whatever reason, then they might be over the hill and surrendering a top 10 pick by the time '28 comes around.
Agree0Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 22:00:10
Actually, from where I’m at, and by all means correct me if I’m wrong, but Philly has our pick 2027 Boston and our pick 2028 or vis versa depending how the league sorts it out. The Colorado pick, because it was acquired, is ineligible for a trade not directly involved in the transaction.
Agree1Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 22:42:34
FrensUnited, you can’t be serious. You really think a Presidents Trophy winner with all the fire power they got is going to miss the playoffs next year. I want what u r 💨💨💨💨 cause it’s gotta be the bomb 🥴😂😂😂😂
Agree2Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 22:53:20
The Colorado pick can be traded to anyone with no restrictions other than the top 10 protected has to stay intact.
Agree0Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 22:59:30
Yes, but Philly nor Boston are entitled to it as they own our 2027 and 2028 1st pick correct?
Agree1Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 23:18:45
They own "Our" first round pick in those 2 years. Not any picks we obtained from any other team. When we made the Trades with Boston and Philly it was stated the picks would be our own from those years. Not an obtained pick that never existed at the time of those trades being made.
Agree2Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 23:44:09
Got it I thought so thanks man!!
Agree0Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 08:46:28
I guess I should of clarified better but I don’t see the Avs taking a huge step back. There’s value in holding onto the pick forsure but if a good player drops this year I’d maybe take my chances a trade up
Agree1Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 13:38:36
@Champ.
Pretty sure last year's President's trophy winner missed the playoffs this year, no?
With Kadri and Neilson entering their late 30s, there's a chance they have issues this year, especially if they Makar or MacKinnon get injured.
Agree0Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 14:53:12
The Florida playoff was a combination of 2 things that I think other teams will learn from. Firstly, Barkov…. I get why they didn’t do the LTIR for the salary cap because they would not be able to use him if he was healthy for playoffs. The new CBA affected their decision. In retrospect, they know now making the playoffs going forward needs to be the goal first and foremost. So if that scenario occurred again, I think they and other teams faced with that decision woukd bring in somebody and utilize that LTIR cap space.
The other factor that caused them to miss (and contributed to more injuries) was not utilizing call ups earlier and more often in the season to rest players. They had played 68 playoff games in 3 years and it took its toll. These are lessons the rest of the league learned from, and Colorado’s management would most likely not get caught in the same scenario.
08 Jun 2026 14:23:39
The Dylan Larkin situation is an interesting one as it will somewhat set a standard on what a #1 Centre is worth even with him kind of dictating the teams he will go to. The leading team for various reasons is Dallas out of the 3 teams he reportedly has told Detroit he wants to go to … Minnesota and Tampa being the others.
If the offer is said to be legit it would be a win-win for both teams. The names floated are Harley and Bourque for Larkin and Carter Bear.
Obviously Dallas gets stronger down the middle and also improves an already good defence with an elite defender and Dallas adds a very good prospect in Bear.
Most important on the Dallas end is they save roughly $6.5 million if Bourque signs in the anticipated $4.5 which allows them to keep Robertson. The plan would be to move Wyatt Johnstone to be on Larkin's wing.
If this comes to fruition it would be an interesting one to see if other parts are added. Would Matthews get us similar or less or more? Or would the extra $5m a year he earns deter some teams?
Believable4Unbelievable0
08 Jun 2026 16:00:07
Minny, Vegas, and Florida were supposedly his list.
Agree0Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 16:38:16
Seravelli says those 3 teams. Friedman on The Fan yesterday said Minny, Tampa, and Dallas. So who knows. But of the 2 I would say Eliot has a way better track record than Seravelli. I find Seravelli, though, is never wrong when he reports a trade after it’s been completed. lol
Agree0Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 22:44:46
I know it’s called guessing. That’s why they use the fancy term speculation or speculating, no fact.
Agree0Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 08:49:05
The rumour from the Detroit Free Press went nuts yesterday so there must be some truth behind it that being said he basically told Detroit to trade him to Minny because the other two don’t have the assets to make it work imo.
Agree0Disagree0
09 Jun 2026 12:28:00
Truth is… what has Minny got to offer up as well? Their prospect pool is ranked in the bottom 3rd of the league and they really don’t want to give up any major substance of their lineup. Anytime a member of the U.S. Olympic team comes up in trade rumours it’s Minny at the top of the list because of Bill Guerin.
Yzerman is going to play hardball and he wants a good return. None of those 3 have the assets. This is going to be fun do see who budges first. Larkin or Yzerman. I think Yzerman will basically tell Larkin to expand the list or report to camp.
08 Jun 2026 08:58:45
Would a trade like this between the Montreal Canadiens and the Toronto Maple Leafs benefit both teams?
So, Brendan Gallagher and Bryce Pickford would go to Toronto, and Brandon Carlo would go to Montreal. Montreal would retain $2 million of Gallagher’s salary.
Gallagher would slot in as a third-line left winger. Bryce Pickford would start in the AHL, but he shoots right, which is a plus, and, so he has good versatility and strong potential. In 2–3 years, he could develop into a second- or third-pair defenseman in the NHL and pp time too.
Montreal needs a right-shot defenseman, and Carlo would be a strong addition for them.
Believable3Unbelievable0
08 Jun 2026 09:10:53
Gallagher is way way way past his prime years and is more suited as a fourth liner. If someone is taking that deal it has something of value attached, so Pickford then sending Carlo the other way is meh. I'd rather walk away from this deal as it doesn't make the Leafs any better right now.
Agree2Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 12:21:25
Not taking on Gallagher at this stage of his career. For sure a 4th liner and trending downwards at that salary for even one year is money thrown away. As far as Pickford, he had a great year in the WHL but if you are giving up Carlo to get him you could keep Carlo to use in a better package and draft Ethan McKenzie in the 3rd round.
You get just as good (Arguably better as a 2 way player and he made the World Junior team, not Pickford.) and a meaner defenseman. Both overage Juniors but as I said McKenzie can be offensive and defensive. Pickford is more a one trick pony offensively.
Agree1Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 21:14:30
I’d do something like this for Reilly just to get him off the books.
Agree0Disagree0
08 Jun 2026 23:06:57
Thisisit, though, had Carlo targeted because of being a right shot. So why would they want Reilly? They already have Hutson, Guhle, Matheson and Struble who are all left-handed shots. I get his logic on the suggested trade. I was just not fond of our return.
08 Jun 2026 18:58:03
I've thought a lot about that same trait idea.
They get a good scoring. Winger and a veteran. D. Who's great in the locker room and we get a prospect
Plus it would be nice to see Robertson go somewhere where he might be used better.