Use our rumours form to send us leafs trade rumors.
Text Size Adjuster: 18px
Site last updated: 19:48:01
24 May 2026 16:05:49
Tor: Matthews, OEL
SJ: Misa, #2ova, #20ova, Chernyahov
Dangling a dman to SJ helps make this cross the finish line. Trading Matthews would ultimately trigger a full rebuild so we get a great haul. We could even consider 50% retention on Matthews for a kings ransom since SJ's RFAs need to get paid.
We can then talk to St. Louis who would have some interests in the #2 pick to have both Stenberg brothers.
Tor: #2ova, Woll
StL: Dvorsky, #11ova, #15ova
Adding Woll balances this trade out. StL can balance and 1a/ 1b scenario with Hoffer and will making room to trade Binnington. Leafs also get their #2 prospect, and 2 1st Rd draft picks.
Tor: Knies, #15 ova
Chi: #4 ova, Rinzel, #34ova, #37 ova
Another bold move. Leafs pick up a solid touching NHL ready RHD and can add one of the top d prospects aswell. But theagic comes in the early 2nd 2 draft picks to take the twins before Calgary
Chicago gets their guy to play with Bedard, and a top 15 pick to work with.
Tor: Nylander
Sea: Wright, #7ova, #38ova
Seattle is looking for a super star and has 2 first Rd picks this year. This gives the Leafs a couple of fair draft picks this year plus a former top draft pick who could use a change of scenery.
Believable1Unbelievable0
24 May 2026 16:54:03
The San Jose trade has San Jose not even remotely considering it…
The St. Louis trade is laughable.
Why not just gift wrap it for them with a bottle of champagne?
The Hawks trade: why are we adding a 1st rd pick?
The Seattle trade is, say what?
A superstar for not even a top five pick? And a center who may not be better than a third line center?
Are you a Kraken fan?
24 May 2026 15:44:39
So of course this is again a wish list and not a reality post but it certainly would turn the page and set a different path if we went into full rebuild with a different cast over the next 4 to 5 years as draft picks and prospects develop but we also stay somewhat competitive as well.
First order of Business is to see if Seattle would take Reilly and his $7.5 in return for us of course sending him there along with our 2nd round pick this year #60 in return for Jani Nyman.
Next would be a trading of Matthews to L.A for Byfield, Brzustewicz and L.A's 1st round pick in 2027 (Non Protected).
Next after that would be Nylander to Dallas along with our best 2nd round pick in 2027 in return for Wyatt Johnston, Brett Seguin (If he can't play we get the LTIR and if he can play we have a solid 3rd liner for only one year at his salaary.This helps Dallas a ton with Salary Cap with $18.25 m going out and only $11.5 coming in. We also want their 1st round pick in 2027.
We then See if Philly would trade us back our Original 2027 1st round pick in return for this Dallas Pick and our other 2nd round pick in 2027.or the rights to Nick Robertson. Thier choice. This allows us to retain that 2027 original pick and then we have to give our 20281st pick to Boston unrotected.
Still more trades and transactions to do but overall we accompish the following with these 3 moves.
OUt- Reilly $7.5 Million
Matthews $13.25 "
Nylander $11.5 "
In- Nyman $891,000
Byfield $6.25 Million
Johnston $8.4 Million
Seguin $9.85 Million
Brzustewicz ELC
Then we have traded away OUr @nd from this year and both our 2nds from 2027 and the frist round pick from Dallas to Philly. But we end up with the above players L.A's 1st in 2027, Our !st round own pick back from Philly and now with the Colorado 1st rounder we got for Roy we have 3 first round picks. PLus we have $7 M in Extra Cap space. That is not even counting if Seguin did go on the LTIR.
Again this is just a start. We could look at a Knies deal Say he and Carlo for Frondell and Korchinski. With the 3 2027 picks if these trades happened take the chance to package them all to grab Landon Dupont. He is the reason we need to stock up on 2027 picks for the chance.
I know it is a pipe dream but I would love to see Frondell and Stenberg (If we draft him you defintely do the trade with Chicago to get Frondell) riding shotgun with Johnston and see what damage Ritchie riding shotgun with Byfield and the beast Nyman could do. Then you have J.T on the 3rd line finally possibly with Seguin and Cowan (Maybe easing Cowan into a centreman with the coaching of the 2 veterans. If he was healthy enough. If we did do a Knies deal for Ritchie and Aitcheson then you have Ritchie with Byfield. Either way with Cowan and either McKenna or Stenberg you would have a pretty entertaining team.
Defense gets better by adding Korchinski and Aitcheson then find a spot for Danford or Chadwick.
A team that is younger and faster with Hungry players.
Believable0Unbelievable0
24 May 2026 15:06:26
Sorry ignore the Ritchie and Aitcheson portion. I was on the phone app and could not find that portion to delete out. The Knies Chicago for Frondell and Korchinski was the final deal. Ritchie and Aitcheson was another option. It would be nice to trade a guy to 2 teams though lol. With Chayka’s checkered background he could try if anyone could lol.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 15:16:16
Why are you trading for everyone's pick next year. This year we have the deeper draft. So it's a hard no on most of those trades.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 15:50:18
How much do you know about the 2027 draft, Hrenkin? It is actually considered to be deeper than this year's. DuPont doesn’t turn 17 until the end of this week, and most scouts and GMs would rank him now in this year's top 3, so he will certainly be going #1 next year. That's why you stockpile a year and 2 years ahead, especially when rebuilding.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 16:04:55
I don’t get the Nylander trade. Wyatt would be awesome, but the second part sounds like a Nathan Horton all over again. I think Nylander is worth more than that. I don’t like the return for Matthews either. No from me as usual.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 16:46:44
@ Leafs GM78
I know you are not a fan of the rebuild and moving those guys. But if we could these players would change the fibre of this team. This will upset the Matthew fans but truthfully as much as he was a goal scoring machine and who knows maybe rebounds a bit..... If I had to watch another game where I see this 6'-3" 215 lb man who is supposed to be the Captain, skate away from one more scrum without helping his teammate/teammates I swear I will puke. I know people will say that's not his game. He is the Captain....that is part of his game. Maybe not to fire fists but to impose his physicallity and pull guys out of that scrum. The team culture needs to change and it starts with the Captain. OK There I did my Sunday Vent.
What's wrong with the Nathan Horton situation? You are giving up a 2nd round pick to pick up a player you are aware might not play and you gain that LTIR if he doesn't. If he actually does he is a good productive player still when healthy.
They say he is actually progressing great after his surgery. As I said that salary would only be on our books for a year and he knows his next contract would only be a 2 year as a UFA at a range of near Tavares in the $4m range if we kept him. But taking him and that cap hiat to Dallas is the only way we pry Johnston from them In which case the rest of the Deal is Nylander for Johnston and a 1st. That is a pretty fair de
As far as the Matthews deal I feel it's fair. Their top young Forward who is getting better each year and is not afraid to lay the body, their top defensive if not top overall prospect in their organization in Brzustewicz and a 1st round pick. That's pretty much what Matthews is worth in the market right now. Especially with him being non-commital about staying. People keep talking about L. A being a good spot for Matthews but realistically this is the best they could probably offer. They have a very thin prospect depth group in their organization.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 17:04:05
I'm not against a rebuild. I think it's premature, and I don’t understand what the benefit of an LTIR player would give us after shedding Nylander’s contract. Why not use the 2nd player for someone you know will play? Wyatt and Nylander are very comparable with each other, so it must be a personal preference to do this which is fine, but you ended it with helping Dallas financially, which I give zero you know what’s about.
I just don’t see the gain for name swapping other than preference.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 17:57:56
Sorry, I guess I am just stupid. Seeing you say I know zero. A team is not prying Johnston or anyone of top talent from Dallas unless they have someone of substance coming and also finding a way for them to lessen their cap.
Just common sense that the whole league knows. Right now their burden is Seguin like ours is Reilly. One question for you though? When is a rebuild going to be not premature? When the value goes down on the players we trade away?
Tavares with solid forechecking wingers will be productive as a 2nd line Center
OEL Jiricek
McCabe Tanev…Danford
Ferraro Villeneuve
Tanev will be injured again by American Thanksgiving
Then Danford is recalled and slides in
Mermis is the 7th d
Ersson Hildeby.
Believable0Unbelievable0
24 May 2026 15:18:01
Why trade Nylander to NY for the 18th, when Seattle is looking for star power with the #7 pick. Puts the Leafs in a better position to get one of the top dmen or c in the draft.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 16:45:17
Hrenklin?
Are you asleep 😴
The 18th is an add on
Leonard and Cristall are what I am after.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 18:27:12
@golftown If we could land Cristall in any manner. The next move is to find a way to trade for Berkly Catton. They were other worldly together in the 48 games they played together in Spokane last year.
23 May 2026 23:40:00
I saw this propsal on a video
To Anaheim
OEL
Carlo
Robertson
Maccelli
2027 1st (via Colorado)
To Toronto
McTavish
Zellweger
Colangelo
Thoughts?
Believable1Unbelievable0
24 May 2026 09:39:56
It’s a solid trade. I just don’t see the need for Robertson and Maccelli to be in there because neither of them would make the Ducks roster, imo, but on the Leafs end I think we’ve all targeted the same group of players. Anaheim has a surplus on D and McTavish hasn’t been great under Q.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 11:05:17
I think Robertson would have a solid crack at the line up.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 11:16:44
I like the targets but think it’s a bit of an overpay.
I’d try and not have to give up another first pick.
Yes we’re asking the Ducks to take an older player in OEL but we’re giving up 4 NHL players for 2 plus a 1st.
We have to stop doing that!
Agree1Disagree0
24 May 2026 11:36:26
Trade makes no sense. You r giving up 2 of our top D men right now for maybe a future top 4 D man. Plus the D you really want to get rid of is not part of the package. Rielly needs to go, not OEL, and dare I say Carlo should not be traded b4 getting rid of Reilly.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 12:53:21
If the Ducks would also add Luneau, I would really consider this one. They get two vet D for a run at it next year and Leafs get two young D to start building off.
Colangelo shouldn't cost much to get, so the first and Robertson I guess would be for MacT, with a bit of Maccelli value. I would likely do it if Luneau was added.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 13:35:02
Anaheim has a surplus on D???
They have 3 signed for next season
Classic GOAT2.0 😂😂😂
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 13:38:12
Replace Oel with Rielly and I would do that trade all day long.
23 May 2026 18:40:41
Tor: Reilly and 2nd or Robertson
Van: Hornek
Believable2Unbelievable0
24 May 2026 10:51:30
After losing Quinn Hughes, I don’t see why the Canucks would consider trading their next best defenseman, Hronek.
Especially for Morgan Rielly who will not help Vancouver keep the puck out of their own net.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 16:08:41
I don’t think Vancouver cares. They aren’t going anywhere for a few years; they get a similar player, home town guy, plus Robertson if needs be, and that might increase ticket sales. I also read an article about this very scenario an hour after I posted this lol.
To NYR: 2027 1st (Col), 2nd rd pick 2027 (1st of 2), Cowan, Robertson RFA rights
To Tor: 5th overall pick.
Draft Mckenna and Reid (if available)
Knies Matthews Mckenna
X (power forward) Tavares Nylander
Joshua (2 way C) (2 way W hitter)
(Tough guy) (reliable 4C) Domi
McCabe Tanev
OEL Reid
Danford Carlo
(Tough guy 6/ 7 D)
Woll
A/ A or Hildeby
Need to make lots of moves or pick up some free agents. Can one of the Marlies fill these spots?
Believable0Unbelievable0
23 May 2026 17:06:31
Lots of player x’s
Makes for lots of ice time for the real players
Lazy post.
Agree2Disagree0
24 May 2026 09:42:49
I’m not sold on Reid. He’s got the tools but I don’t think he’s got the hockey IQ. Plus, seeing what Cowan was able to accomplish in his first year, I’d be hesitant to move him right now.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 11:18:13
Far too rich for me!
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 12:34:49
Lol Golftown ... Lazy post. Not sure I’d go that far on a site made for entertainment purposes but whatever. Having said that, I’m not including Cowan in that deal.
23 May 2026 16:03:59
Just wanted to throw a new one out with a different team
Tampa
Matthews $13.25
Tor
Hagel $6.5M
Cirelli $6.25M
Believable0Unbelievable0
23 May 2026 15:37:34
Who's our 1C now?
Agree1Disagree0
23 May 2026 15:40:30
I absolutely love Hagel but I don’t think it’s enough from TB. I also wouldn’t want to trade any of our stars to anyone in the East. Maybe with the add of top prospect or 1st rd pick on top, maybe. But this is how you change the identity. Like the idea RLF.
Agree0Disagree0
23 May 2026 17:39:39
Gary, if trading Matthews, likely move Willy as well. SJ and Anaheim would be good landing spots as I have mentioned for a long time. If SJ, I would want Misa+. If Anaheim, I would want MacTavish+.
It would be
Cirelli, JT, Misa/MacT.
Also have Hagel to replace Willy.
The +'s could involve D-men coming back as well.
Agree0Disagree0
23 May 2026 17:49:23
I wouldn’t trade for MacT. I don’t see how he would make this a better team.
Agree0Disagree0
23 May 2026 19:38:31
Leafsgm. Just my belief, but I believe MacT is a much better player and is being underutilized in Anaheim. Put him on a team where he is given a real chance to play an important role and I think he can flourish. I think many forget it was only two years ago that he was looked upon as a young leader on that team.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 09:45:45
Trading Matthews in division is a bold move, sir! But it’s an interesting idea. Everyone expects that if the Leafs were to move Matthews that it would be for picks and prospects, triggering a rebuild, but why can’t it be star for star, much like the Rantanen-Necas deal?
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 11:33:16
If you are trading a star player from the roster u r getting a future star player back. McTavish is not that player. It’s either Carlsson, Gauthier, or Sennecke coming back. Not McTavish.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 16:11:53
Didn’t the Ducks make the playoffs, which would make them a better team than us, and not know which direction the Leafs are leaning? This team may not be the “better” team MacT would be better off joining. My evaluation is he’s a bottom six player all day long.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 17:54:03
I never said Toronto is the better team, hence he would have a better opportunity in Toronto as they don't have as many guys at C that are young and ahead of him. If he ends up a high end 3C or low end 2C, so be it. The +(+'s) Leafs would get in the deal would be at least one top prospect/young player.
Seattle wants to get better now. Toronto gets 2 top prospects for 1 of the better goal scorers over the last 2 years. Toronto takes Smits at 7th overall (Early comparisons to Seider).
Tor - 2027 1st, Knies, Reilly
Min- Hughes
This one is a swing. I know poeple don't want to give up Knies but Hughes is a top 2 d-man in the league. Toronto sells Hughes on playing with Matthews and McKenna.
Eventually Smits works his way up to playing with Hughes. Free agents to look at could be trouba, Lauzon, Carlson on back end and Tarasenko, Perry, Jenner, Tolvanen, Laughton, malenstyn up front
Anyone not named thats on an NHL deal trade for picks.
Believable0Unbelievable0
23 May 2026 14:55:59
All good but Domi still appears.
And in the second line 🤮
Agree3Disagree0
23 May 2026 15:46:48
I like the idea. But we must get a solid D somehow in this draft. Trade/draft, don’t care. I’m big on Chase Reid. I’d trade down a few spots, get some compensation, then go for Chase. Personally don’t think Minny would move Hughes. Maybe Faber for a solid return like Matthews. I suggested earlier that Matthews, Carlo would be a good trade for Faber and Boldy.
Agree0Disagree0
23 May 2026 20:58:44
Well if Solid D is what you are looking for in theis draft Clarky, I think we can trade down and get who I think is the steal of the draft, plus additional pieces. We trade down to #4 to Chicago and get greedy (Afterall we are giving them the 1st overall) and ask for their 4th, Vanacker and Pridham. We then take Albert Smits.... this kid has played at every single level you could think of this year, Club Junior and Club Professional in Finland, World Junior for Latvia, Pro in Germany on Loan from his Club in Finland, Olympics for Latvia and the World Championships for Latvie. He doesn't care who he plays against or at what level. He Skates and hits at the same skill level of the players he plays againest or above in any of those Environments.
I love Verhoeff but Smits right now is the most pro ready of all the defensemen available and still has not hit his peak or even close to it. He got lost in the shuffle of the Fixation of the North American defensemen but he is certainly the real deal and it would not be a bad trade to purue especially with the Pridham and Vanacker in there as well. Chicago might bite even at that hight price, because McKenna with his Cousin Bedard (Who both really had not idea who they were because they are so far apart in the cousins family tree) would see tickets, and barring that Frondell with Stenberg would sell tickets as well.
Agree1Disagree0
24 May 2026 09:47:44
The problem you have is pretty clear: you move Nylander for a high pick and prospect but leave a huge hole in your lineup. I’m all for moving Willy if it’s a deal that makes sense.
Agree0Disagree0
24 May 2026 12:38:39
Forward group is not good... Domi on second line says it all.
21 May 2026 21:50:44
And your context on how you know this?
Agree0Disagree0
21 May 2026 21:55:49
To whom were you speaking?
Agree0Disagree0
21 May 2026 22:14:32
To Tags
Agree1Disagree0
21 May 2026 22:28:29
Too many posts of guys just throwing names out. Let's get back to reality and actually post something a little more complete please!!
Agree0Disagree0
21 May 2026 22:45:14
To steal a Don Cherry line that can apply to some of the we/he would or we/hcould or I bet he will lines..... It was a question a reporter asked regarding if Rick Middleton could have played in a important playoff game and iif he could have played they could have been playing the Rangers.
His Response was "Yeah if my Aunt had Nuts she'd be my Uncle"! No better line to respond to Hypethical statements without actual contect.
Agree5Disagree0
21 May 2026 22:49:40
Tits on a bull for me.
Agree1Disagree0
21 May 2026 23:40:01
@Sufferings8nce 1967
Just a hunch.
@LeafsGM78
I will bet you Chayka makes one of these two deals I've listed before start of season.
$100 donated to Sick Kids?
Bet?
Agree1Disagree0
22 May 2026 01:07:24
If I do bets it is with people I know in person. As admirable as your charity of choice is, as I do contribute to it regularly, I am sorry I don't want to be part of taking this site in a direction I am sure the administrators don't want to see it go, as far as monetary bets being part of it.
Agree4Disagree0
22 May 2026 01:10:29
I would be careful if you accept the bet, LeafsG78. People get tossed off sites for stuff like that.
Agree0Disagree0
22 May 2026 01:17:43
It's for a charitable donation, but I will withdraw the offer not to offend anyone.
Agree1Disagree0
22 May 2026 16:19:13
Bets aside. How do you think he gets them tags? Trades? Offer sheets? I can see Zellweger or Hayton being easier than Minty. Zellweger only got into 3 playoff games at 14 mins a night. Minty played all 12 and relied on for over 19 mins a night.
Hayton being an RFA, all depends on how Utah values him and what his salary ask is. I think someone had thrown out a Hayton for Robertson, which I would do if it was in the table.
Agree0Disagree0
22 May 2026 16:57:25
@RLF
Offer sheet is possible and would only cost a 2027 2nd (which Leafs have), but I'm not sure they would do it.
I think this package should be enough for Zellweger (Anaheim will need a defensive RHD if Trouba, Gudas don't re-sign)
Carlo $3.49M/1yr
2026 3rd
I think for Hayton
Robertson and 2027 4th
Or even something with
Stolarz or Woll (Vejmelka was over played last year)
What do you think?
Agree0Disagree0
22 May 2026 19:32:45
Of the 2 dmen. I would take Zellweger over Mintyukov. Mainly because whenever Zellweger would be a healthy scratch he kept his head down did whatever they asked of him in practice and was ready to go when called on.
Whenever Mintyukov gets healthy scratched he wants to be traded. They both have a great offensive side to them. Possible Zellweger a bit more but I will take a character player over a potential prima donna whiner.
Agree1Disagree0
22 May 2026 21:08:35
I actually donate $200 to Sick Kids and Mac Master every year. All of myself and my two boys have taken an ambulance ride to those hospitals.
Noah Chadwick heads to Winnipeg in exchange for Elias Salomonsson. Not a blocksbuster by any means, but the Swedish blueliner still has intriguing NHL potential. Sundin wanted to shake things up a bit, and Chayka finally caves as Salomonsson joins the Leafs family. Because Elias has higher ceiling.
Believable0Unbelievable0
21 May 2026 19:34:07
What do you see that shows he has a higher ceiling?
Agree0Disagree0
21 May 2026 20:48:21
Interesting comparison, methinks.
I think this opinion is based on Salomonsson is an elite skater with 2-way abilities and is already in the NHL.
He also plays with a little more physicality.
I am, however, hopeful that Chadwick can exceed expectations for a 5/6 Dman.
Agree0Disagree0
21 May 2026 21:52:29
He was already in the NHL because of a ton of injuries.
Agree3Disagree0
21 May 2026 22:02:27
Say that name three times fast.