Leafs Trade Rumors

 

Use our rumours form to send us leafs trade rumors.

(single word yields best result)
 
Text Size Adjuster: 18px

Site last updated: 19:48:01

16 Aug 2026 14:39:34
I know this isn’t going to be a popular post on here but I’m doing it anyway.

To Cgy: Roslovic

To Tor: Andreas Englund, 3rd pick 2028

Free Agency: sign Evander Kane 1 yr - 3.25M

A little protection for the big boys.

Kane Matthews McKenna
Knies JT Nylander
Cowan Paul Sissons Joshua Blueger Duhaime
McEwen/ Groulx

OEL Raddysh
Reilly Tanev
McCabe Andrae
Englund/ Stetcher

Move Myers, Lorentz for cap space.
Interchange Kane and Cowan, Knies on this top 3 lines even Joshua. I know everyone is gonna 💩 on Kane but he has spunk, character, not afraid to mix it up or protect teammates. Little older, yes, hips going on him. See if we can get another year or two out of him like we did with Pacioretty. If it doesn’t work first half of the year, move him when Domi gets back.
Have at her, boys!

Believable1 Unbelievable0

16 Aug 2026 15:23:13
Clarky, I actually like the signing man. We do need someone who will go. Kane will! He’s bigger, plays physical, and will stick up for teammates if he’s invested with the team. A PTO might be the move tho. See if he can gel with the team at all. He’s does. He’ll be an asset. He doesn’t, he’s a plug that can be a distraction.

Still like the idea, Roslosvic isn’t going anywhere yet tho. Gotta see how he plays and what he adds to the lineup. He does what they think he stays, for now. He doesn’t, they’ll look to move him to open a spot. We will need to make a move to add, but again I like it!

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Aug 2026 18:09:18
I'm not a fan of Kane. He's been an issue in every city he went to.

I agree a player who is physical would be great on the wing in the middle 6, but just not him specifically.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Aug 2026 13:01:28
With the season fast approaching there are two moves that I would make before the season starts. Put Domi on LTIR and trade both Joshua and Myers. With Domi on LTIR you have cap space to work with and if you trade Joshua and Myers for some draft capital, then you can go into the free agency market and sign players like Michael Bunting, Eeli Tolvanen, James van Riemsdyk, Vladimir Tarasenko, Nick Blankenburg.

Bring in one of those four players can help fill one last spot missing in your lineup and with Blankenburg I’d put him with OEL on the third pairing in the right side. I doubt they’ll sign any of these played but if I had too only sign one player it would be one of these two. Eeli Tolvanen or Vladimir Tarasenko. If we bring one of them in one a PTO then I’d take it as well.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

14 Aug 2026 18:03:10
To Leafs
Gavrikov $7M/6yrs

To NYR
Joshua $3.25M/2yrs
OEL $3.5M/2yrs
2027 1st (top 10 protected via Colorado)

Gavrikov is not happy in NY, so maybe an opportunity for Leafs to snag a solid defensive top pairing Dman, who is locked in for 6yrs (could be the perfect fit with Raddysh).



Rangers get a 1st round pick back, which they used to get Pettersson. Plus a physical bottom 6 player they are in need of. OEL can step into the 2LD position.

Not sure if the values though.

Thoughts?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

14 Aug 2026 20:01:03
Sound good to me. I’d obviously love to upgrade our defense and the package you put together is one we can easily part with and some guys have said that pick maybe more valuable if Colorado misses the playoffs but I don’t see that happening.

Agree1 Disagree0

14 Aug 2026 20:23:06
Nice prop. Big minute muncher in Gavrikov. He has gotten a little more careless with the puck the last 2 seasons, but may also have to do with responsibility given to him. OEL was really good last season and if I was sure we could get two more like that from him, I would probably pass on this deal, but I think the OEL will be hard pressed to repeat last season, so I would probably do this one.

Agree1 Disagree0

14 Aug 2026 21:23:44
Thanks for the reply guys!

@LeafsGM78
Agreed, I don't see Colorado missing the playoffs unless serious injuries happen.

@RLF
I too like OEL, but don't think he'll have a repeat season. Probably best we trade him while the iron is still fairly hot.

Agree1 Disagree0

14 Aug 2026 21:36:43
To go right back to the original post that Gavrikov is not happy in NY. Sorry.... I don't want another whiner here. He signed a 6 year deal at $7 and one year later wants out? Suck it up buddy. Suck it up with the team that you wanted to sign with. Too Bad so sad. So what happens if he gets traded here. He says a year later the same thing. I don't like the direction the team is going just like in New York.

There has to be some accountability. If we are not allowed to trade you because you have your clauses. It does not give you the right to say as a player I a, smarter than the GM and I don't like your direction so trade me. Sorry for the vent rant but enough is enough. I don't want a player like that here.

Agree4 Disagree0

15 Aug 2026 12:43:42
Lol we already have a few of those don’t we?

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Aug 2026 00:07:42
I like the target, but I dont think we should be trading our 1st yet. Gav would work nicely with Tanev.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Aug 2026 02:00:10
@Suffering, I don't think it makes you a whiner for not being interested in a rebuild that lasts forever.

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Aug 2026 15:23:58
To my understanding, he chose the Rangers for money, term and being sold on them wanting to contend. Soon after, they started to trade off their higher profile vets and retool/rebuild whatever you want to call it.

If he is actually unhappy, and it is due to the fact he wants to win, I'm good with that kind of guy on my team. I do agree that we don't need another whiner though. One is gone. More likely need to go.

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Aug 2026 15:36:30
Sorry, no way we add that 1st from Col! First post says it, man. Top 10 protected, yes, if Colorado misses the playoffs. Remember when they did for Makar?! I just think we keep that. Ya, we aren’t getting into the top 10, I know, but! But! What if it’s a 12-15 pick? Next year is a strong draft like this one was.

We keep it and possibly get an excellent prospect. Nope, after what I saw this year, we keep that pick, boys. If we move it, it’s for a larger pkg for a stud D and much younger. There’s still a chance Werenski ends up being moved. Not soon, but I’m just saying we have no firsts for 2 yrs now. We need that pick!

Agree0 Disagree0

16 Aug 2026 15:43:36
Forever? How have The Rangers been in a forever rebuild? Cause sometimes a retool can take a year or two or even three? Think the Habs rebuilt? No! Was a retool… 4 years of getting assets and getting anchors off the books. Now, sorry for us, they’ve built a team we can’t beat in the standing or in a series for years.

So, it’s not a forever rebuild he signed there; suck it up and play! We don't want that on our team. Had it, kinda think we still might cough Matthews but our retool begins in 2 yrs or sooner. Same as the Habs ;)

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2026 01:59:43
I've already targeted 2 top 6 RWers in pruor proposals, so now let's try a more offence 3C.

To Toronto
Frost $3.5M (20% retained)

To Calgary
Joshua $3.5M
Holinka ELC
2027 3rd

Leafs get a GTA boys and his dad works with Leafs organization. He is a more offensely talented 3C who can score more goals and is also good defensively. Cap hit almost a wash as well with the retention.

Calgary gets a physical middle 6 winger with term. Plus a B/ C prospect in Holinka, along with a 3rd round pick for their future.

Thoughts?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

12 Aug 2026 02:26:29
Sorry
Joshua $3.25M/2yrs

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Aug 2026 11:43:16
At Frost’s salary and being there #1 or #2 centreman I don’t see them letting him go and also retaining any salary at all. What’s his dad doing within the Leafs organization? I thought he stopped working with them 10 years ago?

Agree2 Disagree0

12 Aug 2026 12:18:56
You're right, Suffering. I thought his dad was still working for the Leafs.
I think Calgary is going into full rebuild, so Frost (final year of contract) may possibly get traded for prospects and draft capital.
Doesn't hurt to put a feeler out there.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Aug 2026 14:23:06
Weirdly, I almost posted something similar. Mine was Frost for Joshua and a 2nd, no retention on either side. But I would also like Frost to have a little time in Toronto, to see if he'd be a good fit as a 2C next year. Have him share duties with Tavares this year.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2026 20:33:21
I had my eye on Frost before he ended up in Calgary and I believe if not now certainly at the deadline he’ll be made available if even say Joshua and our 1st from Colorado if needs be.

Agree1 Disagree0

13 Aug 2026 13:38:07
I am not as sold on Frost as you guys. He has really improved on the dot, but he still needs sheltered minutes and is kind of a PP specialist. He averages only between 25-30 ev strength points even though he is given mostly offensive situations. For comparison, JT gets more assists typically at even strength per season than Frost does total points.

Frost has never been on a really good team either and that plays a factor for sure. But, if he wants a good raise next contract and he is our best option for 2C for instance, I don't see that as a good thing for the Leafs.

Agree2 Disagree0

13 Aug 2026 16:22:04
Overrated will never be a 2c. I would pass on him.

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Aug 2026 15:52:36
I agree champ! I’m not a Frost at 2C guy. I mean maybe but I strongly doubt it. Only reason we’d consider it is cost factor. Where else could u possibly get a 2C for that cheap? I just think that’s a major issue with this team now and guaranteed in the future so it’s a for sure area we need to address. 2 yrs maybe? Or do we pkg Willy for one at the most convenient time and getter done? I mean when Matthews is moved is it for a pkg of Draft picks and a young stud 1C or how does that shake out cause way I see this we’re just trying to be as competitive as possible til the above mentioned is moved.

Try to keep our lost 1st rounders as high as possible like in the 25 plus is the game plan. Chayka knows we’re not winning with our D or team we have now. Common easy to see the plan and it begins in 2 yrs or less.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2026 21:20:16
Ok so we’ve all ready the articles and I’m curious is there a world we could add Schneider and Kent Johnson?

Tor: OEL Colorado first

NYR: Schneider

Tor: Joshua and a 2nd

Columbus: Kent Johnson.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

12 Aug 2026 02:00:34
Way toooo much for Schneider.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Aug 2026 12:11:33
Not moving any 1st rd picks just yet, unless it's for a legit top dman, or #2 C. If it's not any of those then I'm waiting to see what this team is before any significant draft picks get moved.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2026 20:37:22
Ok, I hear both of you but it’s a Colorado pick so probably a very low 1st round pick so you’d have to add significantly to get a top D or 2C with that pick. My thought was OEL had a good year last season but is aging so the pick is to pad the deal.

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2026 22:34:44
My only concern is that New York needs improvement on Defence. The fact that most New York trade rumours have Schneider in them is worrisome. They need D and yet they are willing to trade a young D that has experience? Everyone says that he had ample opportunity to grab the bull by the horns when Adam Fox was injured.

Agree2 Disagree0

12 Aug 2026 22:42:28
IMO I see Schneider as a bottom pairing Dman, and there is no way I am giving up a 1st for a bottom pairing Dman.

Agree1 Disagree0

12 Aug 2026 23:08:44
I think he’s too young to be labeled a bottom pairing and has played for a less than stellar team. I’d also point out we’d be trading an aging player and you’d be hard pressed to convince me Schneider doesn’t have more upside than OEL, plus I believe the Rangers would get a player that would help them as I said he put up pretty good numbers last season.

Anyway, thanks for the feed back, just an idea, right?

Agree0 Disagree0

12 Aug 2026 23:24:33
I pressed send to fast. Another thing that is worrisome is that adding Schneider and giving up OEL and the First would make Schneider the 6th highest paid skater position player on the team.

And even if he has a average year he will want a raise as a RFA. We would still have OEL at a very manageable $3.5 for 2 years and still have that 1st round pick.

Agree2 Disagree0

13 Aug 2026 14:33:40
I wouldn't want to give that much up for Schneider either. As for Johnson, I don't think that does it even though he is coming off a down year.

Agree0 Disagree0

13 Aug 2026 17:28:37
The least 1st (Col) is more valuable at the deadline than it is pre season. There is always the chance that Colorado could miss the playoffs, injuries, improved divisional teams that could make the pick actually end up 13-16.

If you look at the potential free agents of 2027 there some fair options that look like they could be available.

Agree1 Disagree0

16 Aug 2026 16:03:45
@GM78 Man I mostly would agree with your thinking but, last year crushed that Colorado team in every single aspect. They collapsed bc of no Makar. He’s the engine that drives that squad. I know MacKinnon can yes but if he’s contained they’re very beatable. We keep that 1st. It might end up being super valued by end of season. There was also some very good talent that went 15-25 range. So, we’ve lost ours I think we keep Colorado’s. Then there’s only 1 year we lose a pick in round 1. That won’t happen again for many years.

Only way we pick in 28’ is when we trade guys made available bc they have a great season this year but can be replaced by some of our young guns in the system. Like, Holinka just saying we don’t move him lol. Or when Nylander and or Matthews get the door. Cause it’s coming. Tbh I don’t know if the Leafs want to resign him! I think management wants a different look and different direction just my opinion. I’m sorry guys for this all over rant but I did throw some thoughts out there to get u going.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2026 16:58:01
Mo Rielly and Lorentz to Vancouver for Aatu Räty, 2027 2nd-round pick and a 2027 3rd-round pic. k.
Aatu Räty could compete for a 3rd/ 4th_line center role and get some playing time with the Leafs during the upcoming season. There are always going to be injuries, so it’s good to have some depth at center too.

Toronto could retain $1.5 million of Rielly’s salary.

Toronto trades Dakota Joshua+5th round pick 2027 for Drew O’Connor.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

11 Aug 2026 20:27:40
Not a chance. We have plenty of players to fill that I’m definitely not retaining on Mo's salary. We’d need to upgrade our defensive lineup if we did this.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2026 22:57:50
He is not going to Vancouver and certainly not at a retained salary.

Agree2 Disagree0

08 Aug 2026 00:33:23
TOR: Villeneuve
MTL: Xhekaj

Believable3 Unbelievable0

08 Aug 2026 14:39:44
Why I don’t it, a prospect who will probably get an NHL gig here or elsewhere at some point for a guy I don’t see cracking this lineup anytime soon.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Aug 2026 14:46:23
That was supposed to say I don’t get it but it autocorrected to that lol

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Aug 2026 22:55:09
I really don't get why people like WIFI. He's a goon that can barely skate.

He's fine as a 7th D, but we all know what happens when you trade away prospects for these people.

Agree1 Disagree0

10 Aug 2026 04:24:05
This is horrible and there’s no logic behind it at all.

Agree1 Disagree0

11 Aug 2026 11:04:38
I would do it personally. But I don’t think Villeneuve is going to become anything. He looks timid in the minors never mind the big leagues. But Wifi doesn’t want to be here anyway but I’d have no problem trading Ville.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2026 20:43:40
Dude had 30 points in the regular season and 23 playoff points. Just way too much potential to throw away on a guy who would make the Marlies.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2026 22:01:46
@Clarky Villeneuve stepped up his physical game in the playoffs and was very far from timid. He showed a side of him that people didn't realize he had and he showed it at the right time of the year. I think he has more to show still. We actually have some good depth coming toiwards us defense wise.

Agree3 Disagree0

06 Aug 2026 19:59:28
I really want the Leafs to get a top 6 forward who is also very good defensively. Honestly, I would love to get Mercer, but not sure we have the pieces NJ needs. So, I will pivot to another good option; although significantly older.

To Toronto
Rust $5.125
2027 3rd

To Pittsburgh
Stolarz $3.75M/ 4yrs
Joshua $3.25M/ 2yrs

Then, Leafs sign Ingram from FA
$2.00M/ 2yrs

Toronto gets a top 6 forward who can help shelter McKenna on the top line with Matthews.
Then they sign Ingram to back up Bob.

Pittsburgh needs to upgrade goaltending and if Stolarz is willing, then I hope a deal can be made.

Thoughts?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

06 Aug 2026 22:02:05
I like it !

Agree1 Disagree0

06 Aug 2026 23:45:59
Not for me. Bob was brought in for stability, not run the show. Stolarz is a 6’7” goalie; we just got rid of one in Hildeby. We can’t afford to mess with our goaltending now. Stolarz, when healthy, is awesome, and you know what? I see when a media outlet asks his teammates about him, they all smile and giggle.

He is a presence. Toronto would have beat Florida had it not been for his injury by way of KO crease crash. His frame, his ability, his place in the locker room, he’s the 1a so absolutely no way in trading him today.

Agree1 Disagree0

07 Aug 2026 01:52:41
@LeafsGM78
IMO Bobrovsky was brought in to run the show, not just be part of it. He has played over 50 games per season over the last 'x' number of years.
And we all know the saying,
"The Best Ability is Availibility"
Something Stolarz knows nothing about unfortunately because he is a good goalie when healthy.


I think Leafs just need a pure BUG (cheaper AAV & shorter term), not a 1B who cost $3.75M.
I see Bob playing at least 52 games, back up playing 25 and maybe AA playing 6/7.

Agree2 Disagree0

07 Aug 2026 14:24:30
Interesting. Definitely worth considering from the Leafs standpoint. Although I am concerned about not if, but when the wheels come off on Bobrovsky. When it happened to Brodeur, it seemed quick.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Aug 2026 18:19:44
Silvovs is still young and not ready to be a #1 goalie that can play over 50g that’s for sure. His numbers were pretty bad last season 3.07ga and a .888 save percentage. Their back up is a 22yr old who has 5 NHL games of experience. They could definitely use Stolarz.
Would u guys do this?
Tor
Rust $5.13m
Karlsson $9m($1m ret)
Pitt
Stolarz $3.75m
Rielly $7.5m
Joshua $3.25m
Domi $3.75m

$14.13m in.

$18.25m out. $4.12m in cap space Would u guys consider that? Then sign Ingram to a $1.5-$2m aav for the next 2 seasons. Lorentz either traded or waivered. So u will have the cap space to sign Ingram.

Knies Matthews Rust
McKenna Tavares Nylander
Cowan Paul Roslovic
Duhaime Blueger Sissons

McCabe Raddysh
OEL Karlsson
Andrae Tanev
Stetcher

Bob
Ingram

Agree2 Disagree0

07 Aug 2026 18:47:23
I like it.

If Bob goes down, no cups for this team with Stolarz anyway so who cares.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Aug 2026 18:57:31
Reilly would have to agree. Domi would have to be healthy, and you’re gambling the future of Matthews on Bob and Ingram. If you could get a better backup, I’d think about it, but IMO Stolarz is the backbone this season.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Aug 2026 09:31:32
I didn’t include AA in the scenario but I believe this kid is the future for Leafs sooner rather than later. He’s waiver exempt which is why they got rid of the other 2 guys in trades. I believe if there is a trade for Stolarz that brings in something they need they will pull the trigger on it. There’s already talk of the 3 (Domi Joshua and Lorentz) forwards that will be pushed out are the 3 guys mentioned in the trade I proposed.

There is no more room for these guys. LGM, this guy is the backbone of nothing. He’s made of glass, just like Woll, hence why he’s gonzo. The reason Stolarz will be gonzo as well. Ingram will do the job just fine at a fraction of the cost. If he goes down or Bob does, the Russian super kid will step in.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Aug 2026 14:45:16
Agree to disagree I guess I know he’s a really good goalie we’ve seen what he brings as for made of glass if you played on a team that allows guys to crash into you full speed with no repercussions what would you be made of. I’d really love to see someone run our goalie and all five guys on the ice get ejected for once

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Aug 2026 19:38:42
I agree with Champ. Sadly Stolarz is made of glass. His issues were happening even way before he joined the Leafs. He is just undofrtunately one of those guys that for one reason or another has a body that keeps giving out.

Even prior to coming here, he had played in a total of 108 games and missed due to injury or illness 122 games. Then here is was 60 games played in and 28 games missed to illness or injury. It is worrisome.

Agree0 Disagree0

08 Aug 2026 21:18:30
Weird. I have no idea how it came up those numbers I typed in the exact ones which are.

108 games played in prior to Toronto
122 Games Missed to Illness and Injury

60 games played in in Toronto
67 Games Missed to Illness and Injury

So in his full career he has Physically played in 168 Games and missed 189 games to Illness and Injury.

Agree1 Disagree0

08 Aug 2026 21:46:53
I personally think Stolarz is one of the best goalies in the league when healthy but IMO you can’t be 240 lbs and be a goalie in this league with no injuries. It’s just too much weight and pressure in your joints and at top speed. If he dropped 20-30 lbs, it may go along way for him.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2026 19:24:40
Agreed Clarky, Stolarz is a stud when heslthy, but he is so rarely healthy it really doesn't matter to me. If Bob goes down long term or is just bad, it's lights out for this team unless AA has some kind of miracle run.

Agree0 Disagree0

09 Aug 2026 22:45:58
@LeafsGM You said "Bob was brought in for stability, not run the show." Really? You thing Stolarz should be the #1 and you brought in Bobrovsky at $7 million a year to not run the show? If they were appointing Stolarz as #1 I am sure they would have saved the $7 Million and brought in Talbot or Reimer as backups that could have provided Stability and allowed AA to get starts as well.

That is $7 million that could have tralsnlated into some major moves elsewhere in the lineup. He was brought in to run the Show for as long as he possibly can.

Agree0 Disagree0

11 Aug 2026 20:46:54
Yup, that’s what I’m saying. He, if the crap hits the fan with our goaltending, Bob at 38 years old was brought in to deflect the crap. 7 million was the price to pay for the best available.

Agree0 Disagree0

13 Aug 2026 21:48:42
Bob has been an iron man in the league played 52 games 37yrs old oh ya and Stolarz played 26g at 32yrs old. They traded Woll and Hildeby cause no one wanted Stolarz at his cap hit for the next 4yrs cause they know he won’t play 100g in those 4 seasons glass man 🤣

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Aug 2026 15:08:50
TOR: Reilly, Chadwick, Hopkins, 3rd rd (2027), Domi

VAN: Hronek, Debrusk.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

06 Aug 2026 17:41:58
Canucks don’t even pick up the phone.

Agree2 Disagree0

07 Aug 2026 05:02:13
Seriously?
Hronek, Vancouver’s best defenseman for a bunch of nothing?
Why would Vancouver even consider that let alone add DeBrusk.
That is beyond a one sided trade.
Right away you are talking about Cowan, Danfoed plus!

Agree0 Disagree0

10 Aug 2026 05:25:09
I don’t know if you’re doing ok in the head if you think Vancouver would do this. 😂

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 20:23:30
Trade idea yeep.

Toronto Maple Leafs receive:

Artyom Zub

Ottawa Senators get
Morgan Rielly
Toronto's 2027 second-round pick (CBJ pick).

Something like this:
Oliver Ekman-Larsson - Raddysh
McCabe - Zub
Andrae - Tanev/Villeneuve.

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Aug 2026 20:51:35
Showed this to my son in law over in Ottawa and he pretty near fell off the chair laughing. He wonders why you would expect Ottawa to give up one of the top pairing defenseman for Reilly and the 2nd?

Agree1 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 21:05:26
Maybe because Ottawa is crap and can’t keep star players. Maybe the Leafs add a first, but I don’t think Toronto is interested, as they can sign Stanley for 2 million and keep Reilly.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 21:12:10
It's Ottawa that isn't interested, buddy. Have you seen their top 6 defensemen? I love Reilly, but Ottawa has one of the best defense groups in the league. They don't need or want him. I am a Leafs fan but I agree with my son in law. Ottawa, even without Chucky, is probably going to be a better balanced team with a lot less stupid penalties.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 21:19:38
As bias as it sounds, I’ll meet you halfway and say neither team is interested at this point. Like I said Toronto can sign Stanley for less money.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 21:25:57
If that trade was put in Toronto's lap. They are 100 percent interested. Ottawa not at all. I am not even sure how Stanley came into the equation. But hey if you want to sign him and keep Reilly and be over the Cap by even more money then go for it.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 21:47:07
Yes, absolutely I would because I’ll tell you something right now, Tanev is a mouse fart to the head away from retirement as per his wife; she said if you need one MRI Catt scan you can retire in your hospital gown. So that’s where Stanley fits in and probably 2x2-2.5 probably gets it done and we can certainly make room financially for that.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 21:50:01
Reilly won’t go to Ottawa. And Ottawa would never do that deal. Stanley is gonna be a PTO somewhere. No one wants him. Healthy scratch in the playoffs last year.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 21:54:50
Ya cheap commodity and tradable player if it’s a bust. Options are always a plus. Gambles seem to be the strategy, so hey, PTO for options, yes please.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 21:55:44
Tanev's wife told you that personally?

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 21:56:59
And a player that had a decent season going before being traded and thrown onto a team that over achieved and wasn’t fully prepared for the playoffs.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 22:04:14
Suffering dude, I will not answer that question. I will say no, she didn’t directly, having said that I am close to someone who was in the room, wife in tears saying that’s all I can stand.

Agree2 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 22:05:20
My father in law is Boston fan and he said we should hang onto Reilly this year, to up his trade value and move out all 3 (Reilly, 34 and Nylander) next off season and he never fell off the chair once when he said it.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 22:10:21
Well one thing you just did is create a possible story for some slimy writer or two that follow sites like ours, it could be uncomfortable for the Tanevs if that gets out from a unnamed souce as they call them. Got to be careful of putting things like that out there.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 22:13:48
I’m comfortable in what I said.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 22:21:28
Really, Clarky, one bias per post lol.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 22:29:07
What is with people and Stanley? Zub is a premier defensive defenceman on a decent contract. Why would they want Mo instead?

Might as well throw in a third and ask for Sanderson as well I guess.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 22:35:26
Because that’s what we can afford plan and simple. Make Zub possible for me. What’s the price? What’s your package, anyone.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 23:19:42
You have me confused, LeafsGM. It sounded initially like you had no use for Zub and you want to sign Stanley and keep Reilly. So why ask us to put a proposal package to make Zub possible? It was an initial post from Thisisit, and it, as LeafsLife said, doesn’t make sense.

Zub partners with Sanderson on the first pairing. Reilly would be a 3rd pairing there at roughly $3 more this year. The Sens are looking to open contract talks with Zub in a few weeks anyway.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Aug 2026 00:18:48
No, actually what I said was there isn’t mutual interest in the original post. I voiced my strategy and I’d like to continue the dialogue, as I’m curious: if Reilly isn’t a viable option, what is? As for my strategy, my biggest concern is Tanev; we saw what happened defensively with him out last year, and Stanley is a cheaper option than a trade package for Zub.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Aug 2026 00:45:59
Well, I think Stanley overacheived in Winnipeg and really had not much to lose there in a contract year flying kind of under the radar. But then people noticed the points. Winnipeg wasn't going to re-sign him (which should have been a bit of a red flag for other teams really), then when he got traded most articles were about how he was going to be one of the most sought after free agent defensemen but Buffalo would probalby sign him and how we would command $4 to $5 million.

And then... he crapped the bed in the playoffs and exposed the part of his game the lack of mobility and trouble keeping up to the faster pace. Now there are a few teams sniffing but no-one apparently is offering anything of long term. Some offering 1 year show me contracts that are for less than he wants. He had that opportunity in the playoffs to actually land the kind of money he wanted if he could have performed.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Aug 2026 00:59:37
I would like Stanley on this team personally. We are playing in the toughest division in hockey this year. Would be nice to have guys that aren’t afraid of the physical games and will stick up for each other. He already beat up Brady, so that will help keep those meatballs in check.

The whole team plays better when they know there is protection and people have their backs. Matthews' best year was when we had Reaves on the team. One of the toughest roles in hockey but still very valuable for if you can be an asset to the everyday lineup.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Aug 2026 01:47:52
Clarky, first off, if we want someone to be the enforcer it can’t be a dman. You don’t want an instigator penalty or worse 3rd man in gone for the night then down to 5 dmen. You don’t miss losing the forward as much.

And as much as I hate Brady Stanley didn't beat him up he sucker punched him. I don’t care who the player is. I hate guys even on my own teams in the past who suckered guys.

Agree0 Disagree0

06 Aug 2026 20:53:57
😂 They fought twice. First time Brady tried pushing him over the boards and put his gloves in his face, he deserved a shot. 2nd time they were both willing and though it was a fairly close fight, Stanley won. It would be nice having a sheriff on the back end to actually protect our goalies.

Agree0 Disagree0

07 Aug 2026 00:05:38
1st was a sucker punch. 2nd fight was a draw. He had the advantage early and when Brady got loose, Stanley hung on the got him in the headlock because he didn't like when he was getting hit. I hate Brady, but come on.

Stanley doesn't put the feat in people like guys like Olivier or Reaves when he had two healthy knees. He is by no means a Sheriff. I think the goalies would rather have a d-man that knows how to play better defense.

Agree1 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 17:39:42
Anyone read the article in a one for one trade with Colorado involving Knies and Makar. I know it's all talk. I will say one thing I'm a Knies fan but I'm also a Makar fan. This one for one could work. But why not Rielly Joshua and 2nd rounder for Makar. This way we can keep Knows. Your thoughts?

Believable0 Unbelievable0

05 Aug 2026 17:54:23
I can't even really comprehend either of these trades. It isn't even close.

Agree1 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 18:14:55
Agree with LeafsLife. Knies straight up does not get Makar. And the other package is not as good. In fact Knies along with the other package probably doesn’t make Colorado part with him.

Agree1 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 18:55:33
@Suffering I don't think their is a package that exists that gets Makar. Their entire system is built around him. They would need something like Schaefer back++ to even consider it. Even if you offered Mathews+Knies I'm not sure they would do it as they still then need a 1D.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 18:58:54
You can’t be serious. I love Knies but he doesn’t get you the best D in the league back. The other offer is absolutely absurd!

Agree1 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 20:59:48
Lol sounds like a Luke Fox written article.

Agree0 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 21:50:58
No one with any credibility would have written an article suggesting a one for one trade like that.

Agree1 Disagree0

05 Aug 2026 23:27:59
Nestor Quixtan. He writes for tons of sites. Basically all the same thing. No indude sources. Writes the headline to draw the clicks, then when you read the articles they are pretty much an article about what he thinks could be a good trade etc in his way of thinking.

In other words. Just a guy like any of us but he has found a way to make money by churning these pieces out to any site that will post them.

Agree0 Disagree0


Leafs Rumours 2


Leafs Rumours 3


Leafs Rumours 4


Leafs trade rumours 5


Cell phone only version of this site: https://mobile.leafs-rumours.com

 
Log In or Register to post
User
Pass